Revamping your outlook with latest web/mobile structuring
High-performing, secure and scalable web solutions tailored specifically for your business requirements are created by Techuz. Every project achieves maximum efficiency, adaptability and extensibility through our dual use of monoliths and microservices.
Our dynamic and reliable web applications are created using front-end technologies such as React.js, Vue.js and Angular plus robust back-end frameworks including Node.js, PHP and .NET. To make sure that our data solutions provide secure and scalable storage we use MySQL, MSSQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and AWS DynamoDB.
Our mobile team understands the need for mobile convenience when it comes to accessing online services thus specializes in both native and hybrid app development. We use Flutter and React Native for hybrid apps while Kotlin and Swift are used for native Android development as well as iOS.
Our cloud skills include AWS, Azure and Google Cloud and thus allow us to administer seamless deployment and scalability. No matter if your project requires a simple base system or one that is built on micro services, we employ modern resources and unparalleled methodologies in order to realize it.
We build future-proof applications which develop hand-in-hand with your company from rapidly-launching startups to companies that are looking for CI/CD pipelines powered by Docker or Kubernetes.
Monolithic architecture
Monolithic architecture is the time-honored way of doing things in building web applications and it works wonders. A single gigantic application is produced with all its components tied up into one code base. It has everything, from user interface to business logic and even data management. It suits projects that put a premium on simplicity, fast development speed and easy to manage.
Monolithic architecture is the strategy adopted by Techuz for customers seeking rapid and integrated answers, particularly for tiny to medium-sized applications or MVPs. The main advantages of this approach include:
Microservices architecture
The microservices architecture is a contemporary and versatile method for creating vast, intricate applications by dissecting them into smaller, self-sufficiently deployable services. Each microservice is responsible for a particular function; for instance, user authentication, payment processing or database management and interacts with others via simple application programming interfaces.
At Techuz , we offer microservices architecture for clients who require scalability, fault tolerance and rapid deployment cycles. This architecture is especially suitable for companies anticipating continuous growth accompanied by frequent updates and integration with third-party services. Among the major benefits of this type of architecture are:
Enterprises or projects that demand quick scaling and several services, as well as the capacity for gradual evolution without any major revamping are perfectly suited to microservices.
Serverless architecture with microservices
Serverless and microservices are the contemporary and budget-friendly choices for constructing extensively scalable applications. The serverless architecture enables you to create and deploy apps without having the need to manage any infrastructure; the suppliers of the cloud handle server provisioning and scaling automatically.
At Techuz, we use serverless frameworks such as AWS Lambda, Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions to develop quick and event-driven architectures. Advantages of using serverless model include:
Comparison chart web architecture
CRITERIA
Monolithic Architecture
Microservice Architecture
- Structure
- Single, unified codebase
- Decoupled, independent services communicating via APIs
- Scalability
- Complex to scale, the entire application must scale together
- Highly scalable, individual services can be scaled independently
- Deployment
- Single deployment for the entire application
- Independent deployment for each microservice
- Development Speed
- Faster initial development and deployment
- Slower initially due to managing independent services
- Complexity
- Simple to manage in the early stages
- More complex to manage with multiple services
- Fault Isolation
- A failure in one part can crash the entire system
- Failures in one service do not affect the entire application
- Maintenance
- Harder to maintain as the application grows
- Easier to maintain as each service can be updated separately
- Technology Flexibility
- Limited to one technology stack
- Can use different technologies for different services
- Technology Autonomy
- Less autonomy, teams must coordinate on the entire system
- More autonomy, teams can work independently on different services
- Time to Market
- Quicker for small-scale applications
- Slower for initial setup, faster for long-term updates
- Infrastructure Costs
- Lower infrastructure costs initially
- Higher due to more resources needed for each microservice
- Best for
- Small applications, MVPs, and projects with simple needs
- Large, complex, and scalable applications needing resilience
- Examples
- Small e-commerce sites, CMS systems
- Netflix, Amazon, Uber
Natives mobile development
Techuz is a company that creates outstanding native mobile apps which utilize iOS and Android platforms maximumly. Our development process guarantees praiseworthy performance, user experience and state-of-the-art features. This strategy has the following main advantages:
Key benefits of cross-platform mobile development
Cost effective
Single Codebase: Only one codebase should be developed for iOS and Android which leads to a reduction in both development and maintenance costs as compared to creating separate native apps.
Faster time-to-market
Unified Development: By creating a single app that can run on several platforms, it speeds up the process of development and deployment resulting in faster launch times.
Consistent user experience
Uniform Design: Keep all features similar across iOS and Android to retain the same appearance and feel.
Code reusability
Sharing code base: A large part of code can be reused across platforms leading to easier updates and implementation of new features.
Access to native features
Native Modules: Implement platform-specific functions such as camera access, GPS, and biometric authentication.
Cross-platform frameworks
Framework Efficiency: Utilize strong frameworks like Flutter and React Native that enhance development efficiency by providing a wide range of libraries and components.
Active community support
Nature and Resources: Take advantage of large, active communities and extensive libraries to provide support and tools to enhance development.
Reduced development time
Rapid prototyping: Applications can be developed and iteratively rapidly, enabling rapid prototyping and adaptation to market changes.
Easy configuration
Single codebase management: Simplify maintenance and updates by managing one codebase instead of many, ensuring easy bug fixes and feature enhancements.
Market availability is expansive
Platform coverage: With one development effort, you can reach a wider audience by running your app on two major mobile platforms.
Flexibility and adaptability
Adapting to change: Change the codebase easily in order to adapt for platform updates while ensuring consistency across all of them.
Affordable testing
Integrated Testing: By testing a single codebase across different platforms, this reduces time taken to test so that there is uniformity in user experience.
Comparison chart mobile architecture
Development
Monolithic Architecture
Microservice Architecture
- Development
- Separate codebases for iOS (Swift/Objective-C) and Android (Kotlin/Java)
- Single codebase shared across platforms using frameworks like Flutter or React Native
- Performance
- Best performance with direct access to device APIs and hardware
- Near-native performance with optimized access to device APIs
- User Experience (UX)
- Excellent UX, as apps are fully optimized for each platform’s guidelines
- High-quality UX, but some platform-specific customizations needed
- Access to Native Features
- Full access to device features (camera, sensors, etc.)
- Near-full access with built-in libraries or additional plugins
- Development Time
- Longer due to managing separate codebases
- Faster than native, with shared codebase for multiple platforms
- Cost
- Higher due to separate development efforts for iOS and Android
- Lower than native but higher than hybrid due to specific platform optimizations
- Maintainability
- Harder to maintain with two separate codebases
- Easier than native but may need platform-specific tweaks
- Updates and Time to Market
- Slower, as updates need to be done separately for each platform
- Faster than native, with a shared codebase across platforms
- Technology Stack
- iOS: Swift, Objective-C Android: Kotlin, Java
- Flutter (Dart), React Native (JavaScript)
- Code Reusability
- No code reusability between platforms
- High code reusability across platforms
- User Interface (UI) Consistency
- Platform-specific UI with perfect alignment to OS guidelines
- Near-native UI with shared components but may require platform-specific adjustments
- Best for
- Apps requiring high performance, complex animations, or deep integration with device hardware
- Most business apps, apps that need native-like performance and shared codebase for faster development
- Examples
- Gaming apps, AR/VR apps, complex fintech apps
- E-commerce apps, social media apps, business applications
Frequently
Asked Questions
Greater scalability, fault isolation and technical flexibility are provided by microservices. Each service can be developed, deployed and scaled independently allowing for easy maintenance and efficient upgrades specifically for large or complex systems.
The best choice for small to moderate software or minimum viable products up there is a monolithic design because it prioritizes developing quickly, having simple systems and lower infrastructure expenses above all things. This structuring style may also be excellent if your application does not require constant updating, extensive extensibility or tough incorporations.
To create dynamic and self-scaling apps, event based frameworks appreciate AWS Lambda, Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions that are devoid of any server management, saving on costs and enabling rapid deployment of specific functions at the time of occurrence.
Vertical scaling involves enhancing the capability of a single server (for instance, adding more CPU or RAM), while horizontal scaling implies adding more servers to share the burden. Microservices architecture is specifically designed for horizontal scaling, since individual services can be adjusted independently to meet the fluctuating requirements.
In terms of communications among services, lightweight APIs and protocols such as REST or gRPC are employed together with message brokers like RabbitMQ or Kafka in event-driven architectures. Thus, it guarantees reliable and efficient data interchange between autonomous microservices thus improving system performance and resilience.
Inquires.
[email protected][email protected]Reach us at.